Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers
Premier Nationally Recognized Whistleblower Law Firm
Qui Tam Law Firm
Representing the rights of employees with knowledge of fraudulent conduct.
Leading American Attorneys
Representing whistleblowers nationwide with offices located in Florida and California.
 Home | Steps to Whistleblowing | About Us | FAQ | Resources | False Claims Act | Retaining Our Firm | Respected Law Firm | Contact Us
Home > Government Reports > St. Vincent Charity Hospital & St. Luke's Medical Center DSH Review
St. Vincent Charity Hospital & St. Luke's Medical Center DSH Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our review was to confirm that disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments to St. Vincent Charity Hospital and St. Luke’s Medical Center (collectively, the Provider) during Federal fiscal year 2000 did not exceed the DSH payment limits imposed by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

The Ohio Department of Job & Family Services calculated the Provider’s DSH limit in accordance with the State plan. However, we found that the Provider’s DSH payments exceeded the hospital specific limits imposed by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. We found that the Provider included patient charges totaling $849,596 that did not qualify as uncompensated care in its Medicaid cost reports. The charges included:

• unsupported charges totaling $652,560,
• duplicate charges of $109,768,
• charges for patient bad debt recoveries totaling $38,160,
• overstated charges due to an accounting error of $24,619,
• inflated charges for billing adjustments totaling $17,609, and
• charges for unallowable items and services totaling $6,880.

The costs associated with the unallowable charges were included in the calculated DSH limits and resulted in DSH overpayments to the Provider. Approximately $407,000 of the $849,596 had been allocated into the “non-Medicaid uninsured” cost reporting categories. Ohio calculated the costs of uncompensated care by converting the reported charges to costs through the application of cost-to-charge ratios. When converted from a charge basis to a cost basis, the $407,000 reflects DSH overpayments of about $197,000 ($115,000 Federal share).

RECOMENDATIONS

We recommend that the Ohio Department of Job & Family Services recalculate and recover the DSH overpayment to the Provider of about $197,000 ($115,000 Federal share) and redistribute this amount through its payment distribution formula to other hospitals that may have been underpaid as the result of this overpayment.

OHIO COMMENTS

In written comments to the draft report, the Ohio Department of Job & Family Services requested details showing where charges were reported on Schedule F of the Provider’s cost report, itemized by location (inpatient or outpatient), and by eligibility type (disability assistance, uncompensated care above 100 percent of the Federal poverty level, or uncompensated care equal to or below 100 percent of the Federal poverty level). Ohio indicated that it would then work with the Provider to recalculate and recover any DSH overpayments.

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL RESPONSE

We have attached a schedule to the report, as Appendix A, that shows the necessary adjustments, by location and eligibility type, to Schedule F of the Provider’s cost report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

INTRODUCTION

RESULTS OF REVIEW

APPENDICES

A – Unallowable Charges and Costs Included on Schedule F of Provider’s Cost Report

B – Ohio Department of Job & Family Services Written Comments


Toll Free: 800-FRAUD 04
Do you think you have a claim? Contact Us

Offices:  435 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 401, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33301
Tel: (954) 779 3943 | Fax: (954) 779 3937
110 Pacific Avenue, Suite 162, San Francisco, CA 94111
750 Grant Avenue, Suite 250, Novato, CA 94945

Home | About Nolan Law Firm | Frequently Asked Questions | Whistleblower Resources
False Claims Act | Retaining Nolan Law Firm | A Respected Law Firm | Government Reports | Contact Nolan Law Firm

Overviews:
Qui Tam | Medicare Fraud | Health Care Fraud | Pharmaceutical Fraud
Site Map

The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.


Disclaimer | Copyright © 2006 Nolan Law Firm All Rights Reserved.
Qui Tam False Claims Act Cases - Site Map