Whistle-Blower at NSU will get $538,780 Reward

The Miami Herald
SATURDAY, AUGUST 21, 1999




KAREN RAFINSKI
Herald Staff Writer

The professor who tipped the government about massive billing problems at Nova Southeastern University’s community mental health center will receive more than $500,000 for his troubles, under a settlement approved Friday by a federal judge.

“I feel vindicated,” said Alan Kent, who filed a whistle-blower case against the university that helped spark a federal investigation. “I didn’t go into this for the money. I went into it to change some things that were wrong.”

The university, based in Davie, has admitted no wrongdoing in the case but agreed in February to pay nearly $4.2 million to the state and federal governments for overbilling Medicaid, Medicare and other government programs in its mental health centers around Broward.

An investigation found that more than half the bills that auditors sampled were questionable, and problems ranged from simple overbilling to billing for services that should have been provided by licensed personnel but were provided by unpaid – and sometimes unsupervised – students instead.

University attorney Tom Panza denied all of Kent’s charges Friday. He said the original issue that Kent brought up regarding billing was only a small discrepancy that was immediately corrected and that senior administrators were unaware of Kent’s early complaints.

“You’ve got technical issues that have nothing to do with quality of services,” he said.

Kent, a psychologist at the mental health center, said he first noticed problems in early 1996 when he found bills were being submitted in his name for patients he did not know. In some cases, he said, patients seen by his students were being billed as though he had seen them himself. In other cases, his billing number was used for patients treated in a program he no longer worked for, he said.

He said he brought his concerns to the program’s administrator, only to have his fears downplayed.

The university stopped giving patients consent forms alerting them they were being treated by students, he said. Instead they hung a sign in the clinic saying it was possible a patient might be seen by a student. One patient complained about a bill in Kent’s name because he did not know who Kent was; the patient was shocked to learn he had been seen by a student, Kent said.

*Brushed aside*

And Kent said he was concerned about the quality of care delivered in NSU’s clinics because there wasn’t enough staff to adequately supervise students, he said. Sometimes students worked in satellite clinics with no on-site licensed supervision, he said.

I started to get concerned about being held personally liable,” said Kent, who said he continued to complain to administrators. “I brought all this information to administrators, but I kept being brushed aside. I was threatened with being fired if I did not sign off.”

NSU began an internal investigation of Kent’s charges but dismissed them as without merit. That infuriated Kent, who said he felt embarrassed when a memo, written by Panza, was circulated throughout the university saying his charges were unfounded.

Kent said he decided to go outside. He went to the state Department of Children and Families, but nothing came of his efforts.

FBI takes action

In late 1996, Kent visited the FBI, touching off the federal investigation. He later filed suit under a provision of the federal False Claims Act that allows for whistle-blower claims.

The state agreed to a settlement in February, but the U. S. Attorney’s Office did not approve it until now. Under the terms of the settlement approved Friday, Kent will get 17 percent of the total, which works out to $538,780.76.

The federal government will get almost $2.2 million in cash, and the state will receive psychological services valued at $2 million.

Kent said he felt so harassed for speaking up that he left the university in late 1997. He is now an administrator at a large Seattle medical practice.

Panza denied that Kent was harassed, saying he was promoted to clinic director. And he accused Kent of starting the lawsuit solely to improve his bottom line.

“This was economically driven by him. It wasn’t some moral purpose,” Panza said. “This institution has to pay $4 million for the privilege of providing all these services to the community all these years.”

Kent feels the settlement itself clears his name.

“I don’t think Nova would pay out.. if they were completely innocent of everything,” he said.

The whistleblower in this lawsuit was represented by Nolan & Auerbach, a Fort Lauderdale, FL law firm.

REAL PEOPLE making real change Meet Some of our Heroes

Kathleen Hawkins

Dignity Health
$37 million

Kathleen Hawkins, RN MSN, had been employed by Defendant, Catholic Healthcare West (CHW) for approximately 6 years when she decided she had had enough of trying to change the hospital system from within.

CHW, a California not-for-profit corporation that operated hospitals in California, Arizona, and Nevada, was at the time the eighth largest hospital system in the nation and the largest not-for-profit hospital provider in California.

READ MORE

Joe Strom

Johnson & Johnson
$184 Million

Joe Strom contacted us in 2005. We were very grateful that he did. We immediately formed an all-star legal team and a process to stop a very harmful pharmaceutical marketing strategy. It was this process we set into motion that ultimately returned hundreds of millions of dollars to the U.S. Treasury, and a portion of that, very well-deserved, into Joe’s bank account.

Joe told us a very troubling story about the off-label promotion of a pharmaceutical drug for patients who already suffered from chronic heart failure.

READ MORE

Bruce A. Moilan Sr.

$27 Million

Bruce Moilan was a seasoned hospital systems expert by the time he contacted our Firm. At the time he decided to file his qui tam lawsuit, he was employed by South Texas Health System as a System Director for Materials Management. In this position, he oversaw $24 million in annual purchases of supplies and equipment and helped determine budget, reduction and cost analysis throughout the contract bidding and negotiations process. His job was to insure proper implementation for purchasing, receiving and management of inventory, for McAllen Hospitals, L.P.

READ MORE

Description
Description
Description

“I collaborated with Nolan, Auerbach and White on a broad variety of cases where whistleblowers stepped forward to disclose tactics employed by large companies to influence physicians' medical decision-making in patient care. They provide ample resources to not only optimize their client cases, but in doing so consistently leverage best medical evidence to further patient safety and resource utilization.”

— Fred Polsky M.D., Former Medical Director, CMS Zone 7 Integrity Contractor

Any Questions?

Am I potential whistleblower that matches up well with our firm?

We only want to represent amazing people.

How much will I make?

We cannot guarantee anything, but we will deliver on this promise: we will give you feedback and a prognosis within 48 hours of your submission of all details to us. We are the first healthcare fraud qui tam law firm, and have been doing only healthcare fraud whistleblower lawsuits for decades-so you can expect as accurate a picture as is possible.

Are my communications with you confidential?

They are 100% confidential. If we do not take your case, your information becomes inaccessible. We have no interest in it. Besides, it is protected by the attorney-client privilege under our lawyer regulations, and we would lose our license if we were to disclose one iota of information about you or your potential case.

    Contact Us

    Contact Us

    The more detailed the response, the more likely it is that we will be able to evaluate and determine if your potential False Claims Act case falls within our case requirements. IF IT DOES, WE WILL RESPOND TO YOU WITHIN 24 HOURS. (Names of potential defendants are not necessary at this point, should you feel more comfortable omitting them.) By law, all communications to us are 100% confidential.

    No. of Employees at the Company?
    Please read the following statement and then click "Send Form":

    Any response to your e-mail will be solely to communicate about our possible representation of you under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. All e-mails submitted to us, whether we take your case or not, are 100% confidential. If we do not respond to your e-mail, then you have communicated information which we cannot address because it appears to fall outside of the False Claims Act or our case requirements.