Criminal Charges Unlikely in MIMA Fraud Case

Criminal Charges Unlikely in MIMA Fraud Case
Florida Today
January 21, 2010

As news broke about an impending civil False Claims Act settlement with a large Florida physician group, questions were raised in the public about whether the group would also face criminal charges. Former federal prosecutor and Nolan Auerbach managing partner Marcella Auerbach stated that a criminal case did not appear likely at this point. “They would try to seek a global resolution, to resolve any criminal and civil case,” Ms. Auerbach said. “What companies or physicians groups want to do is resolve all pending allegations, civil and criminal, not piecemeal.”

OUR PROMISE Being a healthcare whistleblower can feel like David taking on Goliath. We help level the playing field.

Our law practice is dedicated exclusively to representing healthcare whistleblowers who are willing to take a stand against unscrupulous corporations that are ripping off our government. Whether the fraud involves __________, we pride ourselves on unparalleled level of service, support and legal assistance for our clients.
Contact Us

Contact Us

The more detailed the response, the more likely it is that we will be able to evaluate and determine if your potential False Claims Act case falls within our case requirements. If it does, WE WILL RESPOND TO YOU WITHIN 24 HOURS. (Names of potential defendants are not necessary at this point, should you feel more comfortable omitting them.) By law, all communications to us are 100% confidential.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
No. of Employees at the Company?


Please read the following statement and then click “Send Form”:

Any response to your e-mail will be solely to communicate about our possible representation of you under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. All e-mails submitted to us, whether we take your case or not, are 100% confidential. If we do not respond to your e-mail, then you have communicated information which we cannot address because it appears to fall outside of the False Claims Act or our case requirements.