News & Views

Medical Device Manufacturers Marketing Pre-1976 Devices for Unapproved Uses

In 1976, Congress amended the FDCA to require any post-1976 devices to be approved via the rigorous Pre-Market Approval (PMA) process, unless the manufacturer could show that the device was “substantially equivalent” to a pre-1976 device or that the FDA had acted to classify the device as Class I or Class II device.

Under the banner, “what is old is new again, ” some device manufacturers are rummaging through their pre-1976 devices and devising new, off-label uses for these devices. Of course, this medical innovation is acceptable and laudable; however, device-makers are required to obtain the FDA’s stamp of approval for such uses of pre-1976 devices that go beyond their original, intended uses. False Claims Act liability will likely be triggered when a manufacturer sidesteps this important approval step.

Similar allegations were raised in a successful False Claims Act qui tam action against Medtronic, Inc. In that case, the United States recovered $2.8 million to resolve allegations that it caused physicians to submit claims to Medicare and TRICARE for medical procedures known as SubQ stimulation that were not reimbursable. According to the lawsuit, Medtronic promoted this procedure by, among other strategies, arranging to have physician-customers attend Medtronic-sponsored “on-site training programs.”

OUR PROMISE Being a healthcare whistleblower can feel like David taking on Goliath. We help level the playing field.

Our law practice is dedicated exclusively to representing healthcare whistleblowers who are willing to take a stand against unscrupulous corporations that are ripping off our government. Whether the fraud involves __________, we pride ourselves on unparalleled level of service, support and legal assistance for our clients.

    Contact Us

    Contact Us

    The more detailed the response, the more likely it is that we will be able to evaluate and determine if your potential False Claims Act case falls within our case requirements. IF IT DOES, WE WILL RESPOND TO YOU WITHIN 24 HOURS. (Names of potential defendants are not necessary at this point, should you feel more comfortable omitting them.) By law, all communications to us are 100% confidential.

    No. of Employees at the Company?
    Please read the following statement and then click "Send Form":

    Any response to your e-mail will be solely to communicate about our possible representation of you under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. All e-mails submitted to us, whether we take your case or not, are 100% confidential. If we do not respond to your e-mail, then you have communicated information which we cannot address because it appears to fall outside of the False Claims Act or our case requirements.