Transplant Fraud Attorneys

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris.

Extensive federal and state laws regulate organ and tissue donation and transplantation. These many regulations were promulgated to address a variety of issues, including the medical, legal, and moral issues involved in organ donation and transplantation. One of the main issues deals with the enormous demand for human organs in a context where there is an inadequate supply of usable organs. These laws are generally viewed by lawmakers, members of the medical professions, and by the populace as a way to ensure the most equitable distribution of organs.

Organ Acquisition Cost Centers (OACC) were developed by HHS to facilitate billing and to defray evaluative services conducted in Clinics for prospective living transplant donors and/or recipients. While Part A and B costs related to the final transplantation surgery and medical follow up had been covered under separate prospective payment arrangements, the Clinic evaluative overhead costs were not previously reimbursable at a level which captured the full expenses incurred.

Transplantation is the most complex of cost reports, since there are three components: physician services (evaluative, medical care, and surgical care), hospital services related to the transplant procedure and any related complications, and organ acquisition costs (OACs). OACs are complex, subject to some variability in interpretation, are defined by specific regulations, and are auditable by the Office of Inspector General. OACs include 1) Final organ procurement costs, including surgery and 2) Organ Acquisition Cost Center (OACC) pre-operative costs, to include: Costs of maintaining waiting lists; all costs of evaluating prospective donors and recipients at a site, including immunological testing; physician services pursuant to these services, not classifiable as direct medical care; salaries and benefits of all ancillary nursing, social work, and technical staff; indirect facility costs, including rent, computers, and supplies.

Whistleblower exposure of Medicare Fraud in transplant centers include the following:

  • Mis-allocation of staff salaries and employee benefits, claimed specifically for pre-operative services (rather than global transplant services)
  • Billing for physician pre-operative services that are otherwise reimbursable under Part A or B. (Physician payments under OACC are limited to services not directly related to identifiable medical care, i.e., only administrative duties in the transplant evaluation center.
  • Mis-allocation of direct and indirect facility costs which are billed under OACC, including space utilization justifications with time studies and overhead costs.

REAL PEOPLE making real change Meet Some of our Heroes

Kathleen Hawkins

Dignity Health
$37 million

Kathleen Hawkins, RN MSN, had been employed by Defendant, Catholic Healthcare West (CHW) for approximately 6 years when she decided she had had enough of trying to change the hospital system from within.

CHW, a California not-for-profit corporation that operated hospitals in California, Arizona, and Nevada, was at the time the eighth largest hospital system in the nation and the largest not-for-profit hospital provider in California.


Joe Strom

Johnson & Johnson
$184 Million

Joe Strom contacted us in 2005. We were very grateful that he did. We immediately formed an all-star legal team and a process to stop a very harmful pharmaceutical marketing strategy. It was this process we set into motion that ultimately returned hundreds of millions of dollars to the U.S. Treasury, and a portion of that, very well-deserved, into Joe’s bank account.

Joe told us a very troubling story about the off-label promotion of a pharmaceutical drug for patients who already suffered from chronic heart failure.


Bruce A. Moilan Sr.

$27 Million

Bruce Moilan was a seasoned hospital systems expert by the time he contacted our Firm. At the time he decided to file his qui tam lawsuit, he was employed by South Texas Health System as a System Director for Materials Management. In this position, he oversaw $24 million in annual purchases of supplies and equipment and helped determine budget, reduction and cost analysis throughout the contract bidding and negotiations process. His job was to insure proper implementation for purchasing, receiving and management of inventory, for McAllen Hospitals, L.P.



“I collaborated with Nolan, Auerbach and White on a broad variety of cases where whistleblowers stepped forward to disclose tactics employed by large companies to influence physicians' medical decision-making in patient care. They provide ample resources to not only optimize their client cases, but in doing so consistently leverage best medical evidence to further patient safety and resource utilization.”

— Fred Polsky M.D., Former Medical Director, CMS Zone 7 Integrity Contractor

Any Questions?

Am I potential whistleblower that matches up well with our firm?

We only want to represent amazing people.

How much will I make?

We cannot guarantee anything, but we will deliver on this promise: we will give you feedback and a prognosis within 48 hours of your submission of all details to us. We are the first healthcare fraud qui tam law firm, and have been doing only healthcare fraud whistleblower lawsuits for decades-so you can expect as accurate a picture as is possible.

Are my communications with you confidential?

They are 100% confidential. If we do not take your case, your information becomes inaccessible. We have no interest in it. Besides, it is protected by the attorney-client privilege under our lawyer regulations, and we would lose our license if we were to disclose one iota of information about you or your potential case.

    Contact Us

    Contact Us

    The more detailed the response, the more likely it is that we will be able to evaluate and determine if your potential False Claims Act case falls within our case requirements. IF IT DOES, WE WILL RESPOND TO YOU WITHIN 24 HOURS. (Names of potential defendants are not necessary at this point, should you feel more comfortable omitting them.) By law, all communications to us are 100% confidential.

    No. of Employees at the Company?
    Please read the following statement and then click "Send Form":

    Any response to your e-mail will be solely to communicate about our possible representation of you under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. All e-mails submitted to us, whether we take your case or not, are 100% confidential. If we do not respond to your e-mail, then you have communicated information which we cannot address because it appears to fall outside of the False Claims Act or our case requirements.