Medicare Advantage Risk Scoring Fraud – Part II

Medicare anticipated that risk scoring fraud would accompany the reimbursement methodology, since provider diagnosis submissions directly impacted plan revenues. For example, in 2004 the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities clearly outlined the potential harm to the Medicare Advantage program, absent meaningful audits and sanctions for overstating Medicare beneficiaries’ burden of illness.

Nonetheless, there is growing concern that the existing audits are not sufficiently uncovering or deterring upcoding, and some Medicare Advantage Plans may be illegally pocketing billions of dollars in overpayments.

Such allegations came to light, for example, in a June 2015 NPR article that exposed the findings of a government audit that detected “widespread overbilling” at one of United Health’s Medicare Advantage Plans. The audit, completed in 2012, found that Medicare had paid too much for nearly half of a sample of patients enrolled at PacifiCare of Washington State, a subsidiary of United Health Group. (Of note, the audit was released to the Center for Public Integrity through a court order in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.)

These allegations do not appear to end with United Health. Indeed, in this same NPR article, the authors point to a previously confidential March 2012 CMS PowerPoint presentation, which “estimates payment errors in Medicare Advantage at $13.5 billion for 2010 and notes that health plans ‘have an incentive to submit more diagnoses’ in order to raise their payments.”

This article has raised a lot of eyebrows (and questions) on Capitol Hill. For example, Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley, recently questioned why the findings of he United Health audit were kept secret from the public. “The public’s business ought to be public, with few exceptions. An agency shouldn’t withhold internal deliberations unless there’s a really good reason for it, like a risk to national security. It seems to me that a discussion of a Medicare overpayment problem and what to do about it ought to be public,” Senator Grassley said in a statement.

However, the biggest takeaway might be that government audits are not a sufficient weapon in the fight against Medicare Advantage Plan risk scoring fraud. The government needs insiders to step forward and expose practices and providers that inflate the health risk of plan members. When qui tam whistleblowers bring such cases to the Justice Department, these cases should be a top priority.

REAL PEOPLE making real change Medicare Fraud Wins

Kathleen Hawkins

Dignity Health
$37 million

Kathleen Hawkins, RN MSN, had been employed by Defendant, Catholic Healthcare West (CHW) for approximately 6 years when she decided she had had enough of trying to change the hospital system from within.

CHW, a California not-for-profit corporation that operated hospitals in California, Arizona, and Nevada, was at the time the eighth largest hospital system in the nation and the largest not-for-profit hospital provider in California.

READ MORE

Joe Strom

Johnson & Johnson
$184 Million

Joe Strom contacted us in 2005. We were very grateful that he did. We immediately formed an all-star legal team and a process to stop a very harmful pharmaceutical marketing strategy. It was this process we set into motion that ultimately returned hundreds of millions of dollars to the U.S. Treasury, and a portion of that, very well-deserved, into Joe’s bank account.

Joe told us a very troubling story about the off-label promotion of a pharmaceutical drug for patients who already suffered from chronic heart failure.

READ MORE

Description
Description

“I collaborated with Nolan, Auerbach and White on a broad variety of cases where whistleblowers stepped forward to disclose tactics employed by large companies to influence physicians' medical decision-making in patient care. They and their medical consultants, have consistently leveraged biomedical research and best medical evidence to advance patient safety, optimize clinical outcomes, and control precious resource utilization.”

— Fred Polsky M.D.,, Former Medical Director, CMS Zone 7 Integrity Contractor

Any Questions?

Am I potential whistleblower that matches up well with our firm?

We only want to represent amazing people.

How much will I make?

We cannot guarantee anything, but we will deliver on this promise: we will give you feedback and a prognosis within 48 hours of your submission of all details to us. We are the first healthcare fraud qui tam law firm, and have been doing only healthcare fraud whistleblower lawsuits for decades-so you can expect as accurate a picture as is possible.

Are my communications with you confidential?

They are 100% confidential. If we do not take your case, your information becomes inaccessible. We have no interest in it. Besides, it is protected by the attorney-client privilege under our lawyer regulations, and we would lose our license if we were to disclose one iota of information about you or your potential case.

    Contact Us

    Contact Us

    The more detailed the response, the more likely it is that we will be able to evaluate and determine if your potential False Claims Act case falls within our case requirements. IF IT DOES, WE WILL RESPOND TO YOU WITHIN 24 HOURS. (Names of potential defendants are not necessary at this point, should you feel more comfortable omitting them.) By law, all communications to us are 100% confidential.

    No. of Employees at the Company?
    Please read the following statement and then click "Send Form":

    Any response to your e-mail will be solely to communicate about our possible representation of you under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. All e-mails submitted to us, whether we take your case or not, are 100% confidential. If we do not respond to your e-mail, then you have communicated information which we cannot address because it appears to fall outside of the False Claims Act or our case requirements.