Physician Anti-Kickback Law

Nolan Auerbach & White is an experienced Pharmaceutical Fraud Law Firm helping courageous whistleblowers.

Historically, healthcare providers have been greatly influenced by payments from the pharmaceutical industry. The results of a study published in 2013 in the Social Science Research Network, confirmed the obvious, that pharmaceutical kickbacks cloud the medical judgment of health care providers. Numerous cases have been brought by whistleblowers exposing such conduct.

The purpose of the study was to assess whether a health care provider who is paid by a specific pharmaceutical firm is more likely to prescribe that pharmaceutical firm’s drugs. To empirically answer this question, the authors used Pro Publica’s “Dollars for Docs” and “Prescriber Checkup” databases to conduct a cross-sectional regression analysis of physician prescribing habits. Because of the availability of prescription-level data, the authors were able to quantify the impact of payments on prescribers.

The authors concluded, “A payment from a pharmaceutical company corresponds to, on average, an additional 29 Medicare prescriptions per year and this number rises to nearly 100 prescriptions if the payment is at least $1000.” As the authors stressed, the payment-for-prescription effect continues to scale with increasing payments. This type of Healthcare Fraud is a violation of the False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Laws.

While the increase in prescribing is noteworthy, the true impact is likely far greater when the drug involves high-priced pharmaceuticals that are prescribed by a small cadre of health care providers. In such instances, the payments to loyal prescribers are typically far greater than $1,000, and the resulting impact on government health care programs can quickly climb into millions of health care dollars.

Kathleen Hawkins

Dignity Health
$37 million

Kathleen Hawkins, RN MSN, had been employed by Defendant, Catholic Healthcare West (CHW) for approximately 6 years when she decided she had had enough of trying to change the hospital system from within.

CHW, a California not-for-profit corporation that operated hospitals in California, Arizona, and Nevada, was at the time the eighth largest hospital system in the nation and the largest not-for-profit hospital provider in California.


Warning: Illegal string offset 'title' in /srv/users/nawprod/apps/whistleblowerfirm/public/wp-content/themes/naw-child/blocks/gutenberg/story-carousel-section.php on line 75

Joe Strom

Johnson & Johnson
$184 Million

Joe Strom contacted us in 2005. We were very grateful that he did. We immediately formed an all-star legal team and a process to stop a very harmful pharmaceutical marketing strategy. It was this process we set into motion that ultimately returned hundreds of millions of dollars to the U.S. Treasury, and a portion of that, very well-deserved, into Joe’s bank account.

Joe told us a very troubling story about the off-label promotion of a pharmaceutical drug for patients who already suffered from chronic heart failure.


Warning: Illegal string offset 'title' in /srv/users/nawprod/apps/whistleblowerfirm/public/wp-content/themes/naw-child/blocks/gutenberg/story-carousel-section.php on line 75

Bruce A. Moilan Sr.

$27 Million

Bruce Moilan was a seasoned hospital systems expert by the time he contacted our Firm. At the time he decided to file his qui tam lawsuit, he was employed by South Texas Health System as a System Director for Materials Management. In this position, he oversaw $24 million in annual purchases of supplies and equipment and helped determine budget, reduction and cost analysis throughout the contract bidding and negotiations process. His job was to insure proper implementation for purchasing, receiving and management of inventory, for McAllen Hospitals, L.P.


Warning: Illegal string offset 'title' in /srv/users/nawprod/apps/whistleblowerfirm/public/wp-content/themes/naw-child/blocks/gutenberg/story-carousel-section.php on line 75

Am I potential whistleblower that matches up well with our firm?

We only want to represent amazing people.

How much will I make?

We cannot guarantee anything, but we will deliver on this promise: we will give you feedback and a prognosis within 48 hours of your submission of all details to us. We are the first healthcare fraud qui tam law firm, and have been doing only healthcare fraud whistleblower lawsuits for decades-so you can expect as accurate a picture as is possible.

Are my communications with you confidential?

They are 100% confidential. If we do not take your case, your information becomes inaccessible. We have no interest in it. Besides, it is protected by the attorney-client privilege under our lawyer regulations, and we would lose our license if we were to disclose one iota of information about you or your potential case.

    Contact Us

    Contact Us

    The more detailed the response, the more likely it is that we will be able to evaluate and determine if your potential False Claims Act case falls within our case requirements. IF IT DOES, WE WILL RESPOND TO YOU WITHIN 24 HOURS. (Names of potential defendants are not necessary at this point, should you feel more comfortable omitting them.) By law, all communications to us are 100% confidential.

    No. of Employees at the Company?
    Please read the following statement and then click "Send Form":

    Any response to your e-mail will be solely to communicate about our possible representation of you under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. All e-mails submitted to us, whether we take your case or not, are 100% confidential. If we do not respond to your e-mail, then you have communicated information which we cannot address because it appears to fall outside of the False Claims Act or our case requirements.