New Part B Fraud: Telehealth Fraud and Covid Testing Fraud

Recent Medicare Coverage rule changes have lowered the bar for Medicare Fraud. Among them are Telehealth fraud and Covid Diagnostic Testing Fraud.

Telehealth Fraud

The CARES Act § 3703 removed the Medicare restriction that only established patients of a physician can receive telehealth services.  Not limited to COVID-19 related services, these telehealth offerings  became available to patients without regard to diagnosis, making claims for services permissible  in lieu of in-person  office visits, mental health counseling, and preventive health screenings.

The CARES Act §§ 3705 and 3706 also waived the requirements for certain face-to-face visits between (1) home dialysis patients and physicians and nurse practitioners and (2) hospice patients and physicians and nurse practitioners.

In addition, the CARES Act § 3707 broadened telehealth services to home health patients, including for remote patient monitoring. Section 3708 loosened the conditions of payment by allowing physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and other professionals, under physician supervision, to order home health services for beneficiaries.

While telehealth services are now broadly covered, a sound policy decision, Telehealth Fraud still occurs where the service level is either not provided or is  not medically necessary (e.g., the provider submitted level four established patient visit, yet only furnished or the patient only needed a level two visit). Further, the patient file should reflect notations in support, using the current Evaluation and Management Services documentation guidelines (e.g., time or key components).

Covid Diagnostic Testing Fraud

Medicare covers inpatient hospital stays, skilled nursing facility stays, some home health visits, and hospice care under Part A. Outpatient services, including physician visits, emergency ambulance transportation, and emergency room visits, are covered under Part B. When inpatient hospitalization is required for treatment of COVID-19, such treatment will be covered for Medicare beneficiaries, including beneficiaries in traditional Medicare and those in Medicare Advantage plans.

Medicare Part B (Medical Insurance) has covered testing for COVID-19 since February 2020.  .Under the FDA’s March 16, 2020 Guidance under CMS coverage regulations, tests and devices commercially developed prior to the FDA granting an EUA, have still been covered.  Coverage became triggered after the manufacturer’s validation of the test’s efficacy; this could occur while the applicant manufacturer was preparing its EUA request, as long as the manufacturer provided instructions for use of the test and posted data about the test’s performance characteristics on its website. CMS also provides coverage of serology tests to identify antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 when the test has been validated, notification is adequately provided to the FDA, and appropriate warning statements are included with the tests. The warnings, for example, should note that the test has not been reviewed by the FDA and that results from antibody testing should not be used as the sole basis to diagnose or exclude SARS-CoV-2 infection or to inform infection status.

False Claims Act Part B violations for Covid diagnostic testing fraud arises where the manufacturer has submitted false data to the FDA, or failed to substantively comply with the FDA’s March 2020 Guidance.

REAL PEOPLE making real change Meet Some of our Heroes

Kathleen Hawkins

Dignity Health
$37 million

Kathleen Hawkins, RN MSN, had been employed by Defendant, Catholic Healthcare West (CHW) for approximately 6 years when she decided she had had enough of trying to change the hospital system from within.

CHW, a California not-for-profit corporation that operated hospitals in California, Arizona, and Nevada, was at the time the eighth largest hospital system in the nation and the largest not-for-profit hospital provider in California.

READ MORE

Joe Strom

Johnson & Johnson
$184 Million

Joe Strom contacted us in 2005. We were very grateful that he did. We immediately formed an all-star legal team and a process to stop a very harmful pharmaceutical marketing strategy. It was this process we set into motion that ultimately returned hundreds of millions of dollars to the U.S. Treasury, and a portion of that, very well-deserved, into Joe’s bank account.

Joe told us a very troubling story about the off-label promotion of a pharmaceutical drug for patients who already suffered from chronic heart failure.

READ MORE

Bruce A. Moilan Sr.

$27 Million

Bruce Moilan was a seasoned hospital systems expert by the time he contacted our Firm. At the time he decided to file his qui tam lawsuit, he was employed by South Texas Health System as a System Director for Materials Management. In this position, he oversaw $24 million in annual purchases of supplies and equipment and helped determine budget, reduction and cost analysis throughout the contract bidding and negotiations process. His job was to insure proper implementation for purchasing, receiving and management of inventory, for McAllen Hospitals, L.P.

READ MORE

Description
Description
Description

“I collaborated with Nolan, Auerbach and White on a broad variety of cases where whistleblowers stepped forward to disclose tactics employed by large companies to influence physicians' medical decision-making in patient care. They provide ample resources to not only optimize their client cases, but in doing so consistently leverage best medical evidence to further patient safety and resource utilization.”

— Fred Polsky M.D., Former Medical Director, CMS Zone 7 Integrity Contractor

Any Questions?

Am I potential whistleblower that matches up well with our firm?

We only want to represent amazing people.

How much will I make?

We cannot guarantee anything, but we will deliver on this promise: we will give you feedback and a prognosis within 48 hours of your submission of all details to us. We are the first healthcare fraud qui tam law firm, and have been doing only healthcare fraud whistleblower lawsuits for decades-so you can expect as accurate a picture as is possible.

Are my communications with you confidential?

They are 100% confidential. If we do not take your case, your information becomes inaccessible. We have no interest in it. Besides, it is protected by the attorney-client privilege under our lawyer regulations, and we would lose our license if we were to disclose one iota of information about you or your potential case.

    Contact Us

    Contact Us

    The more detailed the response, the more likely it is that we will be able to evaluate and determine if your potential False Claims Act case falls within our case requirements. IF IT DOES, WE WILL RESPOND TO YOU WITHIN 24 HOURS. (Names of potential defendants are not necessary at this point, should you feel more comfortable omitting them.) By law, all communications to us are 100% confidential.

    No. of Employees at the Company?
    Please read the following statement and then click "Send Form":

    Any response to your e-mail will be solely to communicate about our possible representation of you under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. All e-mails submitted to us, whether we take your case or not, are 100% confidential. If we do not respond to your e-mail, then you have communicated information which we cannot address because it appears to fall outside of the False Claims Act or our case requirements.